The model drivers I mentioned had a casting added to damp resonances.
The late model drivers weigh more than they early models because of that casting.
So you completely misunderstood.
I pointed to a series of drivers designed to reduce the issues you were talking about.
This paper discusses increased magnet size
http://alteclansingunofficial.nlenet...ers/TL_231.pdf
Here is the back of a 288C sheet...20 pounds.
http://www.voiceofthetheatre.com/images/288C.2.jpg
And the back of a 288G sheet 29 pounds
http://www.voiceofthetheatre.com/images/288G.2.jpg
To sum up....you are using a lightweight version of the driver designed for higher crossover points used in modern systems, I attempted to direct you to designs optimized for lower crossover points.
The pot casting to damp resonances was added to late Alnico 288, 291, and 290. It was retained when the switch was made to ferrite.
Essentially you are arguing that a 29 pound driver wont resonate less than a 20 pound one.







Bookmarks