Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: phenolic vs symbiotik conundrum

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Hostboard Member
    phenolic vs symbiotik conundrum


    Old Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    6,359
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    62 Post(s)

    Re: phenolic vs symbiotik conundrum

    The model drivers I mentioned had a casting added to damp resonances.

    The late model drivers weigh more than they early models because of that casting.

    So you completely misunderstood.

    I pointed to a series of drivers designed to reduce the issues you were talking about.

    This paper discusses increased magnet size

    http://alteclansingunofficial.nlenet...ers/TL_231.pdf

    Here is the back of a 288C sheet...20 pounds.


    http://www.voiceofthetheatre.com/images/288C.2.jpg

    And the back of a 288G sheet 29 pounds

    http://www.voiceofthetheatre.com/images/288G.2.jpg


    To sum up....you are using a lightweight version of the driver designed for higher crossover points used in modern systems, I attempted to direct you to designs optimized for lower crossover points.

    The pot casting to damp resonances was added to late Alnico 288, 291, and 290. It was retained when the switch was made to ferrite.

    Essentially you are arguing that a 29 pound driver wont resonate less than a 20 pound one.
    Your neighbors called. They like your music.

  2. #2
    Inactive Member kevin@kab's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 8th, 2010
    Posts
    18
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: phenolic vs symbiotik conundrum

    Hi,
    The only points I am making are:
    The drivers are brand new made less than 30 days ago, that they have a low frequency specified rating of 300Hz,
    and that they were reccomended for my application.
    And yet at the very low power that I operate them at -less than 90dB measured at the horn mouth- they are producing a signficant "double tone" at all frequencies below 1000hz
    also, as you lower the level down, you hit a point where a "chorus" of tones appear.
    Both drivers do this, so that to me indicates that they are defective in some way.

    I am unable to accept this as "normal" operation.

    Perhaps if I were running these at very high levels, true resonances - that are the result of build design- will apear, but I would not expect that at these low levels.

    Kevin
    010311

  3. #3
    Senior Hostboard Member GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 26th, 2002
    Location
    Chamblee, Ga.
    Posts
    4,967
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    48 Post(s)

    Re: phenolic vs symbiotik conundrum

    Remove the rear cover and see if it still happens.

    GM
    Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.

  4. #4
    Senior Hostboard Member
    phenolic vs symbiotik conundrum


    Old Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    6,359
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    62 Post(s)

    Re: phenolic vs symbiotik conundrum

    Quote Originally Posted by GM View Post
    Remove the rear cover and see if it still happens.

    GM
    Interesting idea.

    I'm wondering,,,the big transformer cans...would there be any merit to trying them without the inside cover, possibly filling them with different types? probably not...just my wandering attention span again....

    I would think obviously the driver would have to be derated, or am I wrong again?
    Your neighbors called. They like your music.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 28100561 times.